Cases 1 - 10 of 52
CASTILLO et al v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
ERASMO CASTILLO and ANA GUADALUPE SANCHEZ
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. doing business as UPS and CASEY P. ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Moreno v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv01872
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Sanchez Moreno
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0401 Social Security Act - Trust Funds
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Sanchez Contreras v. Garland
as 23-60325
Petitioner:
Estela Guadalupe Sanchez Contreras
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Sanchez et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19682
Plaintiff:
Heleo Sanchez and Guadalupe Sanchez
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Kim Rogers v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 22-16997
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM EDWARD ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff, GUADALUPE SANCHEZ, Manager, California sex offender registry and others
USA v. Sanchez-Sierra
as 22-50695
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Guadalupe Sanchez-Sierra
Sanchez Sierra v. USA
as 2:2022cv00035
Petitioner:
Maria Guadalupe Sanchez Sierra
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(PS)Rogers v. Bonta et al
as 2:2022cv01157
Plaintiff:
Kim Edward Rogers
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Jim Cooper and Guadalupe Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Sanchez-Felix
as 22-1188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLOS GUADALUPE SANCHEZ-FELIX, AKA Carlos Felix-Sanchez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
