Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida
as 24-10537
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. OTTO and JULIE H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA
Robert Otto, et al v. City of Boca Raton, Florida, et al
as 24-10478
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. OTTO and JULIE H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLORIDA and COUNTY OF PALM BEACH, FL
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Hamilton v. MECC
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
James H. Hamilton
Defendant:
MECC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS)Penta v. Bond et al
as 2:2022cv01215
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Penta
Defendant:
Steven A. Bond, Jason M. Saunders, Joseph R. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkins v. Sharpe
as 21-2346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER A. G. SHARPE, Clerk, ALLISON, Chief Deputy Clerk, EVELYN, Administrative Matters (including personnel) HR of Clerk's Office and others
Hamilton v. WellPath
as 4:2021cv00846
Plaintiff:
Lonnie H Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
WellPath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2021cv01949
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL H. HAMILTON
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Hamilton v. Richard Jennings
as 20-1426
Respondent:
Richard Jennings
Petitioner:
James H. Hamilton
Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 7:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Jeff McCracken, County of Orange, James T. Bryan, III and others
Plaintiff:
Napier Sandford Fuller and Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee et al v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 7:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Jeff McCracken, County of Orange, James T. Bryan, III and others
Plaintiff:
Napier Sandford Fuller and Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
