Cases 61 - 70 of 489
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Lumsden v. Collier et al
as 6:2022cv00822
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Lumsden
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Oscar Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tianhai Lace USA, Inc. v. H&M Hennes and Mauritz, L.P.
as 1:2022cv04650
Plaintiff:
Tianhai Lace USA, Inc.
Defendant:
H&M Hennes and Mauritz, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Dye v. AECOM Federal/Technologies et al
as 1:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Scott Dye
Defendant:
AECOM Federal/Technologies, Department of General Services of Virginia, Virginia ABC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Harris v. H&M Hennes &Mauritz L.P.
as 5:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Damesha Harris
Defendant:
H&M Hennes &Mauritz L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Essa v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB
as 2:2022cv10796
Plaintiff:
Neda Essa and Minor ZN
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
H&M ASSOCIATES, LLC. v. USA
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
H&M ASSOCIATES, LLC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
