Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Miller et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv15320
Plaintiff:
Rodney Miller, Eric Miller, Edwin G. Enger and others
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Don Beachem and Ms. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Crossley v. Cole et al
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Lamont Crossley
Defendant:
J. Cole, J. Williams, M. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Crossley v. Cole et al
as 2:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Lamont Crossley
Defendant:
J. Cole, J. Williams, M. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney L. Rollness v. H. Flores et al
as 2:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Rodney L. Rollness
Defendant:
H. Flores and J. McIlrath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27304
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO H FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANCHEZ et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv11091
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DORELIA SANCHEZ and OSCAR H. FLORES
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flores v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03186
Plaintiff:
Reuben H Flores
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jose Flores Alvarado v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71576
Petitioner:
JOSE H. FLORES ALVARADO, AKA Jose Flores, AKA Jose Flores Alvaro
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
USA v. Benito Flore
as 17-50489
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BENITO HERNANDEZ FLORES, also known as Benito H. Flores
Carter v. Voong, et al.
as 1:2017cv00245
Plaintiff:
Dominic Carter
Defendant:
H. Flores , S. Longoria , C. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
