Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Avila et al v. Thomas et al
as 1:2020cv00411
Defendant:
Levco Property Management, LLC., William H. Thomas, Jr., Donna P. Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Avila and Jasmine Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bavaro v. Polymeropoulos, M.D. et al
as 1:2019cv01701
Defendant:
Kenneth Bate, Vincent J. Milano, H. Thomas Watkins and others
Nominal Defendant:
Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Bavaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Thomas v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI
as 19-2541
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT H. THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI
USA v. Robert Thomas
as 19-2553
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT H. THOMAS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 4:2017cv02164
Petitioner:
Robert H. Thomas
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMAS v. WINGARD et al
as 3:2015cv00020
Plaintiff:
ROBERT H. THOMAS
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD, JOHN WETZEL and DANIEL MEUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEINSTEIN et al v. LENFEST MEDIA GROUP, LLC
as 2:2014cv01251
Plaintiff:
MARC WEINSTEIN and H. THOMAS FERGUSON
Defendant:
LENFEST MEDIA GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
PURISIMA v. REVEL ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 1:2013cv02772
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
REVEL ENTERTAINMENT, SARFINO PELLEGRINO, M. W. GORANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv01188
Plaintiff:
Bill H. Thomas and Barbara J. Thomas
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY , SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. L.L.C. and SANOFI-SYNTHELABO INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
MORAN v. GOLDFARB et al
as 2:2012mc00301
Plaintiff:
H. THOMAS MORAN , III
Defendant:
MORTON GOLDFARB, PATRICK ROTH, CATHERINE BRIENZA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
