Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Howell v. Pleshchuk et al
as 2:2018cv01788
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Defendant:
R. Pleshchuk, K. Franceschi, H. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Pleshchuk et al
as 1:2018cv00826
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Defendant:
R. Pleshchuk, K. Franceschi, H. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipsey v. Mahakian et al
as 1:2018cv00027
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Mahakian, H. Williams, R. Dietrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipsey v. Mahakian et al
as 2:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr.
Defendant:
L. Mahakian, H. Williams, R. Dietrich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 17-17449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Williams v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02813
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Trans Union LLC
Plaintiff:
Anna H. Williams
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stephen v. Fox et al
as 2:2016cv02574
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Stephen
Defendant:
R W Fox, D E Cueva, D Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest Woods, II v. Kevin Chappell, et al
as 16-16500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, THE VETERAN ADMINISTRATION, THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS and others
Quintero v. Holstedt et al
as 6:2016cv01047
Defendant:
Walter M. Beglau, Judge Linda L. Bergman, Chief Judge Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Quintero, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
