Cases 1 - 10 of 18
McKay v. RBM Partners LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Keith McKay
Defendant:
RBM Partners LLC doing business as Chez Paree, Jason Hams and Sinetria Staples
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Ham v. Mac's Convenience Stores, LLC
as 4:2023cv01214
Plaintiff:
Billy Ham
Defendant:
Mac's Convenience Stores LLC doing business as Circle K, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Boles v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Prentis Boles
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, National Mediation Board, Michael Buttry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Moore v. Fitzinger et al
as 5:2021cv06121
Plaintiff:
Vernon Moore
Defendant:
Andrew Fitzinger, Christopher Ham, Jordan Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Moore v. Fritzinger et al
as 5:2020cv06085
Plaintiff:
Vernon Moore
Defendant:
Christopher Ham, Jordan Shultz and Andrew Fritizinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Bouzeanes et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2018cv01806
Plaintiff:
Richard Richards, Olivier Durand, Danny White and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. v. DuCharme et al
as 4:2018cv00650
Defendant:
Peggy Leineke, Joshua Rhodes, James DuCharme and others
Plaintiff:
Ruane, Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Arman v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv02360
Plaintiff:
Andrew Arman
Defendant:
Jason Davis, Ham Payne Fum, Cindy Griffith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
