Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Naman Augusta, LLC
as 24-11070
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
NAMAN AUGUSTA, LLC
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 24-11073
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, JACOB T. HAYES and others
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilhy Harpo-Brown v. Director, Richmond County Board of Elections, et al
as 24-10078
Plaintiff:
WILHY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY COMMISSION
Harpo-Brown v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Wihly Harpo v. Robert Hunter, III, et al
as 23-12911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WIHLY HARPO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. HUNTER, III, CARLETTA SIMS-BROWN, VERA L. BUTLER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Harpo et al v. Hunter et al
as 1:2023cv01454
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo, T. Mary Brown, Zeric Wideman and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Hunter, III, Carletta Sims-Brown, Vera L. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harpo, Inc. v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv06787
Plaintiff:
Harpo, Inc.
Defendant:
KELLIE CARTER JACKSON, LEAH WRIGHT RIGUEUR and ROULETTE PRODUCTIONS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
