Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hartsfield v. Columbia County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2026cv02209
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A. HARTSFIELD
Defendant:
Columbia County Sheriff's Office, Lake City Police Department and Columbia County Multi-Jurisdictional Drug Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAVES v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2026cv00186
Plaintiff:
BEYONCA GRAVES
Defendant:
SCOTT MAPLES, THOMAS, OLFTLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEWELL v. MAPLES, JR. et al
as 4:2026cv00174
Plaintiff:
BREANNA JEWELL
Defendant:
SCOTT A. MAPLES, JR., CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CLARK COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steven Mogan et al v. Corcoran Trucking, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv03525
Plaintiff:
Steven Mogan and Dennise Manning
Defendant:
Corcoran Trucking, Inc., James Wayne Hartsfield and Does 1 through 200, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
(HC) Hartsfield v. CDCR et al
as 3:2026cv02116
Petitioner:
Avonte Hartsfield
Respondent:
CDCR and The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avonte Hartsfield v. CDCR
as 2:2026cv03347
Petitioner:
Avonte Hartsfield
Respondent:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hartsfield v. CDCR et al
as 2:2026cv01020
Petitioner:
Avonte Hartsfield
Respondent:
CDCR and The People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hartsfield v. CDCR
as 2:2026cv01019
Petitioner:
Avonte Hartsfield
Respondent:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. Cooley Dismukes et al
as 5:2026ct03053
Plaintiff:
Corey Tashombae Hines
Defendant:
Leslie Cooley Dismukes, Peter R. Buchholtz, Larry Dail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
