Cases 11 - 20 of 1,362
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 24-11073
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, JACOB T. HAYES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tracy Sanders, et al v. Reid Forrester, et al
as 24-1699
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Sanders and David Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Reid K. Forrester, in his individual capacity, Shalonn K. Curls, in her individual capacity, Rodney J. Campbell, in his individual capacity and others
KENNEDY v. B & C TOWING et al
as 2:2024cv04458
Plaintiff:
MELVENE KENNEDY
Defendant:
B & C TOWING, ANGEL CONCEPCION and IVORY HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lotta v. County of Monroe et al
as 6:2024cv06194
Plaintiff:
Vincent E Lotta
Defendant:
County of Monroe, Monroe County Sheriff Office, Eric Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hayes v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
MARC HAYES
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
