Cases 31 - 40 of 1,362
Hayes v. MCR Health, Inc.
as 8:2023cv02933
Plaintiff:
Keturah Hayes
Defendant:
MCR Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
HAYES v. MCR HEALTH, INC.
as 8:2023cv02932
Plaintiff:
KETURAH HAYES
Defendant:
MCR HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Woloszyn et al v. County of Tioga et al
as 3:2023cv01585
Plaintiff:
Aimee Rice, Terry Ann Woloszyn, Esther Haines and others
Defendant:
County of Tioga and James McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VAUGHN v. BOROUGH OF PORTAGE et al.
as 3:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
GARY E. VAUGHN and GARY E. VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF PORTAGE, ROBERT KOBAN, ROBERT FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jon'Ta Hampton-Bey v. Blowing Rock Police Department
as 23-2187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JON'TA HAMPTON-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BLOWING ROCK POLICE DEPARTMENT and JONATHAN HAYES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Denise Tsibouris v. Colerain Township, OH, et al
as 23-3887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE Y. TSIBOURIS
Defendant / Appellee:
COLERAIN TOWNSHIP, OH, MARK DENNEY, Colerain Township Chief of Police, MATT WAHLERT, President, Colerain Township Board of Trustees and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
