Cases 31 - 40 of 145
- Wright v. Granville County et al
as 5:2020cv00661
Plaintiff:
Admr John H Wright
Defendant:
Edward Cash, Steven Hayes, Jr., Charles Royster Noblin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers et al v. Cumberland County Department of Social Services et al
as 5:2020cv00477
Plaintiff:
K.R., K.G., Kahleighia N. Rogers and others
Defendant:
LaTanya Burgan, Brenda Reid Jackson, James Dill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wood v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hayes Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williamson v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00377
Defendant:
John Deere Company, GREENE TWEED & COMPANY, INC., DCO LLC, f/k/a DANA COMPANIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
William Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HAYES v. USA
as 1:2020cv00617
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
KENNETH RAY HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PHILLIP v. MCGILL BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.
as 1:2020cv00540
Defendant:
MCGILL BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.
Plaintiff:
KAREN HAYES PHILLIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HAYES v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00483
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KARA HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Bell v. Smith et al
as 5:2020ct03186
Defendant:
Officer Hodge, John Palisko, Captain Hayes and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien et al v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 5:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pryor, Candi Ellis, Thomas Keister and others
Defendant:
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. D.P.S, NC Corr
as 1:2020cv00104
Defendant:
D.P.S. NC State Agency Institution and Board, Clarence Stewart, D.P.S., NC Corr and others
Plaintiff:
Delmar Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
