Cases 41 - 50 of 223
O'Donnell v. Sullivan County et al (JRG2)
as 2:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Captain Lee Carswell, Sullivan County, Joseph Tomes and others
Plaintiff:
Bethany O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. FFE Transportation Services, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 2:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
FFE Transportation Services, Inc. and Mercury Wayne Hayes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mabry v. FFE Transportation Services, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 2:2020cv00060
Defendant:
FFE Transportation Services, Inc., Mercury Wayne Hayes, Jr and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Ashley Mabry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tucker et al v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Taylor Hart, T.J. Miller, Lance Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Harley Lambert, Tiffany Lewis, Shannon Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Adams et al v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv00296
Plaintiff:
James Spann, John Saulsberry, Roy Rodgers and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Lee Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Hampton
as 2:2019cv00074
Respondent:
Kevin Hampton
Petitioner:
Ronald C Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hayes v. Memphis City Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv02511
Plaintiff:
Dejuan Darnell Hayes
Defendant:
Nate Lenow and Memphis City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elam v. Lake County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2019cv01141
Defendant:
Keith Ozment, Nathaniel Hayes and Lake County Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Granville Elam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
