Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bowmar et al v. Hearst Properties, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bowmar and Josh Bowmar
Defendant:
Hearst Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Bowmar et al v. Hearst Properties, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bowmar and Josh Bowmar
Defendant:
Hearst Properties, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv80249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Nicklen et al v. Mashable, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10300
Defendant:
Advance Publications, Inc., CONDE NAST ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, Tegna, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Nicklen and Cristina Mittermeier
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
RISHELL et al v. HEARST PROPERTIES, INC.
as 5:2017cv05496
Plaintiff:
DONNA RISHELL and EARL RISHELL
Defendant:
HEARST PROPERTIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed Wright v. Rayena Sheppard-Oswald
as 17-6453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REED ANTHONY KEVIN WRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYENA SHEPPARD-OSWALD, BRIAN OSWALD, HEATHER HUBERT, in her individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
GREENVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CAROLINA CHILDREN'S HOUSE, ANTHONY WRIFFORD, in his individual and official capacities and others
Respondent:
THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SOLICITOR
Wright v. Sheppard-Oswald et al
as 6:2014cv04646
Plaintiff:
Reed Anthony Kevin Wright
Defendant:
Rayena Sheppard-Oswald, Brian Oswald, Greenville County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
