Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Heather A. Davis et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2022cv00949
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Davis and Robert Sweeny
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Davis et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Heather A. Davis and Robert Sweeny
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv03964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Davis v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03251
Plaintiff:
Heather Lynn Davis
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LESLIE v. WARD et al
as 7:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Lt MCDOUGLE, HEATHER A DAVIS, Warden SHAWN EMMONS and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE KYEVONNIE LESLIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. WOODS et al
as 7:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
ERIC REED
Defendant:
SHUNDA WOODS, HEATHER A DAVIS, LESLIE PLUGGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heritage Golf Group LLC et al v. Davis
as 9:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
Heritage Golf Group LLC , Heritage Golf Group Inc , Heritage Golf Port Royal LLC and others
Defendant:
Heather McLaurin Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIPORE v. BLAKELY et al
as 7:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
MWAMARATUNGA PIPORE
Defendant:
DON BLAKELY, HEATHER A DAVIS, DENISE HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2015cv01120
Plaintiff:
Heather M. Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02356
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
