Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Intervenor:
Heavy & General Laborers' Local 472 & 172 Pension and Annuity Funds
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Norris v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 4:2020cv00543
Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Thomas A Kennedy, Michael J Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Norris
Petitioner:
Heavy & General Laborers' Locals 472 & 172 Annuity Fund, FNY Managed Accounts LLC, Kee Chun Hon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
3M Co, et alIn re: 3M Co, et al
as 20-2864
Petitioner:
MICHAEL F. ROMAN, NICHOLAS C. GANGESTAD, In re: 3M CO and others
Respondent:
IRON WORKERS LOCAL 580 JOINT FUNDS, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Office of the Rhode Island Treasurer on behalf of the Emloyees' Retirement System of the State of Rhode Island, HEAVY & GENERAL LABORERS LOCALS 472 A& 172 WELFARE FUND and others
Heavy & General Laborers' Local 472 & 172 Pension and Annuity Funds et al v. Fifth Third Bancorp et al
as 1:2020cv02176
Defendant:
Tayfun Tuzun, Fifth Third Bancorp and Greg D. Carmichael
Plaintiff:
Lee Christakis and Heavy & General Laborers' Local 472 & 172 Pension and Annuity Funds
Petitioner:
Joseph Esner, The Hins Family, Anne Focht and others
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
as 1:2020cv01683
Plaintiff:
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Defendant:
Fifth Third Bank, N.A.
Intervenor:
Heavy & General Laborers' Local 472 & 172 Pension and Annuity Funds
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
HEAVY & GENERAL LABORERS' LOCALS 472 & 172 WELFARE FUND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv15982
Defendant:
MICHAEL F ROMAN, INGE G THULIN, 3M COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
HEAVY & GENERAL LABORERS' LOCALS 472 & 172 WELFARE FUND
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. Synchrony Financial et al
as 3:2018cv01818
Plaintiff:
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund, Stichting Depositary APG Fixed Income Credits Pool and Stichting Depositary APG Developed Markets Equity Pool
Defendant:
Brian M Doubles, Synchrony Financial, Margaret M Keane and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Arthur W Coviello, Jr., Laurel J Richie, William W Graylin and others
Petitioner:
Danica Pension, Livsforsikringsaktieselskab, Heavy & General Laborers Local 472 & 172 Pension, Annuity and Welfare Funds and KBC Asset Management NV
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gilbert and Maureen Aldridge
City of Sterling Heights Gener, et al v. Prudential Financial Inc, et al
as 16-1090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and of Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, HEAVY & GENERAL LABORERS LOCALS 472 & 172 PENSION ANNUITY FUNDS, NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC, JOHN R. STRANGFELD, RICHARD J. CARBONE and others
City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System et al v. Prudential Financial Inc. et al
as 2:2015mc00146
Plaintiff:
City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System , National Shopmen Pension Fund , Heavy & General Laborers Locals 472 & 172 Pension Annuity Funds and others
Defendant:
Prudential Financial Inc., Strangfeld R. John and Mark B. Grier
Movant:
California Department of Insurance and David E. Jones
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
PAUSEIRO et al v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ et al
as 2:2015cv03523
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO PAUSEIRO and MARIA PEREIRA
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ , TARHEEL ENTERPRISES, INC., HEAVY & GENERAL LABORERS LOCAL 472 and others
Cross_claimant:
VOLVO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NORTH AMERICA, INC. and KENCO
Cross_defendant:
ABC COMPANY (1-10), JOHN BASSANI, CITY OF NEWARK and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
