Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Spruill v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
as 2:2016cv00275
Plaintiff:
Margaret V. Spruill
Defendant:
H & M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Unicolors, Inc. v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P. et al
as 2:2016cv02322
Defendant:
Does and H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Unicolors, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Casey et al v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 1:2015cv02242
Plaintiff:
Chivonne Casey and Goodwin Eremah
Defendant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Torres v. H& M Hennes & Mauritz L.P. et al
as 1:2014cv08995
Plaintiff:
Raymond Torres
Defendant:
H& M Hennes & Mauritz L.P., The City of New York, Raymond A. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 14-56253
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership
Malibu Textiles, Inc. v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 14-56203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIBU TEXTILES, INC., a New York corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
H&M HENNES & MAURITZ, L.P., a New York limited partnership
Grill Concepts, Inc. v. Management Resource Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv22418
Plaintiff:
Grill Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Management Resource Systems, Inc. and H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cross_claimant:
H&M Hennes & Mauritz L.P.
Cross_defendant:
Management Resource Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Terrance White v. H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
as 2:2014cv01483
Defendant:
Does and H & M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Terrance White
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
