Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Thompson v. Warden of Livesay Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv03331
Plaintiff:
James Henry Thompson, II
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson et al v. SouthState Bank, N.A.
as 8:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Henry Thompson and George Vargha
Defendant:
SouthState Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mayes v. Munive et al
as 1:2023cv03408
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Mayes
Defendant:
Officer A. Munive, Prosecutor Alex Oberkofler and Judge Henry Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Georgia v. Mayes
as 1:2023cv02743
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia, Judge Henry Thompson and Attorney Alex Oberkofler
Defendant:
Chauncey Aaron Mayes
Harmon v. Municipal of Cobb County, GA et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Randy Harmon, Jr.
Defendant:
Municipal of Cobb County, GA and Henry Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Tolson et al
as 1:2023cv00735
Plaintiff:
James Henry Thompson, II
Defendant:
Sheriff Kevin Tolson, Chief John Hicks, Count Officer Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
David Barrow v. Gary Williams
as 21-7593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES BARROW
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY WILLIAMS, GARY T. SETTLE, HAROLD W. CLARKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. Community Health Center of Richmond, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03094
Defendant:
Henry Thompson and Community Health Center of Richmond, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Walsh et al
as 1:2021cv03092
Plaintiff:
Henry Thompson, Martin J. Walsh and Community Health Center of Richmond, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
