Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Koch et al v. Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michele Koch and Kendal Koch
Defendant:
Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education, Pleasant Hill R-III School District, Andrew Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hocker et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Brian Hocker, Brian Carrillo, Deepa Hayre and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Cummins Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biederman et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2023cv06640
Plaintiff:
Frank Biederman, Carl Anders Troedsson, James Farinet and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC and Cummins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sims v. IDOC et al
as 4:2023cv04221
Plaintiff:
Danny Sims
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, . Baker, Ryan A Oelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. IDOC et al
as 3:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
Danny Sims
Defendant:
IDOC, Warden Baker, Ryan` A Oelberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hocker v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01512
Plaintiff:
Walter Vincent Hocker
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
HOCKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08108
Plaintiff:
RYAN HOCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOCKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv24366
Plaintiff:
RYAN HOCKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hocker v. Revlon Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10471
Plaintiff:
Beth Hocker
Defendant:
Revlon Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
