Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hopper v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00945
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Hopper, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo, et al.
as 26-5670
Plaintiff:
ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN
Defendant:
J. CARRILLO, Staff/Officer, F. NUNEZ, Staff/Officer, F. GUZMAN, Warden and others
Shallowhorn v. Hopper, et al.
as 26-5469
Plaintiff:
ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN
Defendant:
HOPPER, CPT, F. GUZMAN, Warden, Sgt. ESTRADA and others
Harrod v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 3:2026cv00066
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Harrod
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care, Shelby County Detention Center, Franklin County Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrod v. Comprehensive Correctional Care et al
as 3:2026cv00620
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Harrod
Defendant:
Comprehensive Correctional Care, Shelby County Detention Center, Franklin County Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper et al v. Hamilton et al
as 5:2026cv02052
Plaintiff:
Keith D Hopper, Travis Foote and Michael Moore
Defendant:
Casey Hamilton, Ashley Allen, Bailey Ritter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stallings et al v. Hopper et al
as 3:2026cv00215
Plaintiff:
Tonya Marie Stallings and William Steve Stallings
Defendant:
Kelley Hopper, Cody Edgar, Tiffany Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Federal Trade Commission v. Hopper (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv13058
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Hopper (USA), Inc. and Hopper Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Mitchell et al v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
as 1:2026cv03651
Plaintiff:
Steven Mitchell, Dori Mitchell, Jerome Hopper and others
Defendant:
Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
