Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Hoang v. Hulme
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Dawn Hoang and Nick Huynh
Defendant:
Michael Hulme, Paula Hulme, Jill Caisey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Aston Leather, Inc. v. JWH Aquisition Company, et al
as 0:2023cv01938
Plaintiff:
Aston Leather, Inc.
Defendant:
JWH Aquisition Company, d/b/a JW Hulme, FL Aquisition Company d/b/a JW Hulme, JWH Acquisition Company doing business as JW Hulme and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROYE v. HULMES
as 2:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ROYE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SUTTON v. HULMES
as 2:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
TODD SUTTON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HULME v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02499
Plaintiff:
PADRAIC EDWARD HULME
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WASIUTA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASIUTA
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ajay Hulme v. CIR
as 22-70262
Petitioner / Appellant:
AJAY HULME
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1753
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Rose Karam v. University of Arizona, et al
as 22-15332
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSE ANN KARAM
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA, SOUTHERN ARIZONA VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Davis Monthan Air Force Base and others
Defendant:
DAVID LAMB, AMY KENNEDY, SHANNA O'CONNOR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
