Cases 1 - 10 of 11
DOMINGUEZ v. HYTROL CONVEYOR COMPANY INC. et al
as 1:2023cv20092
Plaintiff:
ALEIDA LIZ DE DOMINGUEZ
Defendant:
HYTROL CONVEYOR COMPANY INC., BASTION SOLUTIONS, B&H PHOTO-VIDEO INC. RPC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phillips v. Hytrol Conveyor Company Inc
as 3:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Jordan Phillips
Defendant:
Hytrol Conveyor Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv03472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Hytrol Conveyor Company Inc. v. Hilmot LLC
as 2:2018cv01502
Plaintiff:
Hytrol Conveyor Company Inc.
Defendant:
Hilmott LLC and Hilmot LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hytrol Conveyor Company Inc v. Centimark Corporation
as 3:2014cv00261
Plaintiff:
Hytrol Conveyor Company Inc
Defendant:
Centimark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Trost et al v. Hytrol Conveyor Company, Inc.
as 3:2008cv50218
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Trost, Daniel T. Trost, Daniel T. Trost and others
Defendant:
Hytrol Conveyor Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Galvan v. Fortna, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv05864
Plaintiff:
Rafael Galvan
Defendant:
Fortna, Inc. and Hytrol Conveyor Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
