Cases 1 - 10 of 439
Kelly McSean v. Chris Chamberlain, et al
as 24-1674
Plaintiff:
Kelly La Gale McSean
Defendant:
Chris Chamberlain, Head of Security, Jeff Cunningham, Sally Port Supervisor, Misty Kindle, Physician and others
Estes v. Hacker et al
as 2:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Donald Eric Estes
Defendant:
Hacker, Ridenour, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTSOCK v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HARTSOCK
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, ROBERT BUPREY, BRANDY LEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Chamberlain et al
as 4:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Kelly La Gale McSean
Defendant:
Chris Chamberlain, Jeff Cunningham, Misty Kindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean Davidson v. Donna Anderson, et al
as 23-3160
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dean Bryan Davidson
Respondent / Appellee:
Denise Hacker, C.O.O. of the S.M.M.H.C., Mark Stringer, Director of M.D.M.H. and Donna Anderson, C.O.O. of the S.M.M.H.C.
Strutton et al v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
Dennis Strutton and James Moller
Defendant:
Denise Hacker, Christopher Chamberlain, George Killian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chad Vice v. State of Iowa, et al
as 23-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chad M. Vice
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Iowa, Jana Hacker and Iowa Department of Corrections
Ballard v. Reitz et al
as 4:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Cory R. Ballard
Defendant:
Dr. Robert Reitz and Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aufderheide v. Hacker
as 4:2023cv01026
Petitioner:
Joan L. Aufderheide
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Locke v. Hacker et al
as 4:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Locke
Defendant:
Denease Hacker and Mark Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
