Cases 1 - 10 of 1,159
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant:
Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Merriman et al
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Robinson
Defendant:
Jerard Merriman, Amanda Smith, Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Fisher v FNU Whitley, et al
as 6:2024cv01950
Plaintiff:
Arthur Fisher
Defendant:
FNU Whitley and Jeff Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hammond v. Hooper
as 79-4029
Petitioner:
Forrest Hammond
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Peters v. Joyner et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Donmier Peters
Defendant:
Sgt. Joyner, C.O. Downes, Cpl. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Prator
as 24-30058
Plaintiff:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Chaplain Patin-Hammond, Director Hicks and others
NUNLEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
WALTER J. NUNLEY
Respondent:
STEVE KALLIS, BRADLEY HAMMOND, ROBERT ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hammond v. Lumpkin
as 24-10181
Petitioner:
James Bradley Hammond
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Manuel v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Karl B. Manuel
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Matthew Mucha, Marcus Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
