Cases 1 - 10 of 11
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHAM v. HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY ALAN WITHAM, JR
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL and SCOTT KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vistante v. Twaddle et al
as 4:2023cv04125
Plaintiff:
Jonah Vistante
Defendant:
Kelly Twaddle, Nicole Johnson, Joshua Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Hancock County Jail et al (PSLC2)
as 3:2023cv00108
Petitioner:
Martin Ray Rouse
Respondent:
Hancock County Jail and Brad Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROWE v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY ROWE
Defendant:
TREY EDWARDS, HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, ZACH NAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEARSON et al v. CAMBELL et al
as 1:2021cv01454
Defendant:
CAMBELL and HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
JIMMY YAGER and PATRICK PEARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. Cambell et al
as 2:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Hancock County Jail and Major Cambell
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Yager and Patrick Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christy v. Hamilton Police Department et al
as 4:2019cv04070
Defendant:
Hancock County Sheriff's Department, Hamilton Police Department, Hancock County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
IC Frederick Christy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Hancock County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv00020
Plaintiff:
Charles Craig Parker
Defendant:
Hancock County Jail, Wade Ladner and Unknown Jaufrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Hancock County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00109
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Lawson
Defendant:
Hancock County Jail, Leamon Maxey and Cathy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
