Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Farrow v. Smith et al
as 9:2026cv00852
Plaintiff:
Justin Farrow
Defendant:
Officer Smith, John Doe #1, Officer Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Azat Gezalyan v. Sarkis Gezalyan et al
as 2:2026cv04031
Plaintiff:
Azat Gezalyan
Defendant:
Sarkis Gezalyan, Susanna Muradian, Image Financial LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PATEL et al v. RUBIO et al
as 1:2026cv00030
Plaintiff:
SHAILESHKUMAR MANIBHAI PATEL, MINALBEN SHAILESHKUMAR PATEL and SHARVIL SHAILESHKUMAR PATEL
Defendant:
MARCO RUBIO, JOHN ARMSTRONG, MIKE HANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv02531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00171
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
