Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hann v. Ypsilanti, City of et al
as 2:2011cv12244
Plaintiff:
Gary S Hann
Defendant:
Ypsilanti, City of, Edward Koryzno, Ronald Monroe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623
David J. Lashgari, et al v. William J. Bratton, et al
as 09-56289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID T. LASHGARI and MARJE H. LASHGARI
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. BRATTON, LAPD, Chief, J NICHOLSON, JOHN LEBERKNIGHT and others
Defendant:
JOHN ERDERT, JOHN FERRIS, STEVE COOLEY and others
Clark v. Hann et al
as 2:2009cv01452
Plaintiff:
Peter J.D. Clark, Sr.
Defendant:
Hann, Rick Brazeil, Sacramento Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MaGee et al v. Village of Minooka, The et al
as 1:2008cv05749
Plaintiff:
Kimberly MaGee and Michael Norris
Defendant:
Village of Minooka, The, Minooka Police Department, The, Doug Hayse and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY S. BUSH et al v. PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2008cv03797
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF ANTHONY S. BUSH, JOSEPH BUSH, HEATHER BUSH and others
Defendant:
PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP, JAMES WEHMAN, RICHARD LUDEN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hawkins v. City of Kenosha et al
as 2:2007cv00712
Plaintiff:
Steve Hawkins and Steve Hawkins
Defendant:
City of Kenosha, Daniel C Wade, Lewis Lindquist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
