Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Julius Walker Irick Jr et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01748
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Julius Walker Irick, Jr, Jerry Allen Hall, Albert Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Flossie Duku v. Bonnie Hannan
as 19-2411
Defendant / Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ALJ BONNIE HANNAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FLOSSIE A. OBBO DUKU
Hannan et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv16560
Plaintiff:
Tami Hannan and Daniel John Hannan
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hannan v. The Home Depot et al
as 1:2015cv03559
Plaintiff:
Edward Hannan
Defendant:
The Home Depot , United Site Services of MD, Inc. and All Green Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Scott v. City of Norfolk
as 11-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NORFOLK, REGINA WILLIAMS, BERNARD A. PISHKO and others
Scott v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2010cv00611
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Regina V.K. Williams, Bernard A. Pishko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2010mc00024
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Regina V.K. Williams, Bernard A. Pishko and others
Scott v. City of Norfolk et al
as 2:2010mc00020
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
City of Norfolk, Regina V.K. Williams, Bernard A. Pishko and others
Scott v. Norfolk Circuit Court et al
as 2:2010mc00011
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
Norfolk Circuit Court, Everett A. Martin, Jr., City of Norfolk and others
Scott v. Norfolk Circuit Court et al
as 2:2010mc00010
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
Norfolk Circuit Court, Everett A. Martin, Jr., City of Norfolk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
