Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Walker v. Schult
as 20-2415
Defendant:
Steven Wagner, Associate Warden, FCI Ray Brook, Anne Mary Carter, Associate Warden, FCI Ray Brook, J. L. Norwood, Regional Director and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jackii Sepanek, Counselor, FCI Ray Brook and Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Ray Brook
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ellis Walker
David Hill v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 19-2213
Defendant / Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID E. HILL
In re: Wattleton, et al
as 13-1297
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons and T. MARSHAL, Director US Marshal Service
MCCALL v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2011mc00471
Plaintiff:
BONDARY MCCALL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Dale Heineman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-55936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN and FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA
Dale Scott Heineman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011cv00522
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and Francisco J Quintana
Plaintiff:
Dale Scott Heineman
STINE v. LAPPIN
as 1:2010mc00228
Plaintiff:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Berro v. Lappin et al
as 0:2010cv00244
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Berro
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Devin Nagle, Todd Valento and others
David Stephenson v. J. Gronolsky, et al
as 10-70058
Petitioner:
DAVID CARROLL STEPHENSON
Respondent:
J. GRONOLSKY, HARLEY LAPPIN, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
McCray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2009cv03458
Petitioner:
Sammy McCray
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and Grayer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
