Cases 31 - 40 of 59
HANKINS v. BEARD et al
as 1:2008cv00219
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant:
DONALD KELCHNER, MARK KRYSEVIG, BLAINE STEIGERWALT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Grace et al
as 4:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
Henry Unseld Washington
Defendant:
James L. Grace, David J. Wakefield, R. M. Lawler and others
Amicu:
G C Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NIFAS vs. BEARD et al.
as 2:2008cv00834
Plaintiff:
RASHEED NIFAS
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, DAVID J. WAKFIELD, HARRY E. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlie Richardson v. Harry Wilson
as 08-1464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLIE L. RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY E. WILSON, Staff Attorney of Department of Public Instruction
Movant - Appellee:
ROBERT REILLY, W. CLARK GOODMAN, MARK P. HENRIQUES and others
Francis Veasey v. Atty Gen PA, et al
as 08-2113
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS EDWARD VEASEY
Defendant:
ATTY GEN PA, DA PHILADELPHIA and HARRY E. WILSON
David Serrano v. Louis Filino, et al
as 08-2107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID SERRANO
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, SHARON BURKS, LOUIS FILINO and others
Robert DeShields v. Harry Wilson, et al
as 08-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DESHIELDS
Defendant:
ATTY GEN PA, DA PHILADELPHIA and HARRY E. WILSON, et al
Scher v. Legg et al
as 1:2008cv00517
Petitioner:
Stephen Barry Scher
Respondent:
Jason J. Legg, Jeffrey A. Beard, -, Harry E. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DARBY v. GOOD et al
as 2:2008cv01282
Plaintiff:
KAREEM T. DARBY
Defendant:
DAVID J. GOOD, HARRY E. WILSON, PATRICIA C. WILLET and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MAYSONET v. WILSON
as 2:2008mc00037
Plaintiff:
JAVIER MAYSONET
Defendant:
HARRY E. WILSON
Cause Of Action: Local Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
