Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mitchell et al v. The United States of America
as 5:2026cv00422
Petitioner:
Harry Mitchell, II
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Patagonia, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv08458
Plaintiff:
Patagonia, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Yanqing Ma, xuemei liu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Mitchell v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2016cv01118
Petitioner:
Harry Mitchell
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Harris-Mitchell et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 1:2013cv25430
Plaintiff:
Jeanetta Harris-Mitchell and James O. Mitchell
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. v. VARIOUS JOHN & JANE DOES, et al
as 1:2013cv01039
Plaintiff:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC.
Defendant:
CLINTON BERNARD, ROUGUILON HENDRICKS, MARCUS ANTHONY WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Mitchell v. Thaler
as 4:2010cv05167
Petitioner:
Jerome Harris Mitchell
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mitchell v. Quarterman
as 08-20209
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEROME HARRIS MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
