Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Thomas et al v. KB Home Lone Star LB et al
as 4:2011cv00314
Plaintiff: Harry Thomas and Abby Thomas
Defendant: Countrywide KB Home Loans and KB Home Lone Star LB
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
WADELTON v. CLINTON et al
as 1:2011cv00049
Plaintiff: JOAN WADELTON
Defendant: HILLARY R. CLINTON , PATRICK F. KENNEDY , NANCY POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 4140
HARMER v. MASON et al
as 2:2010cv01040
Plaintiff: HARRY THOMAS HARMER
Defendant: KEVIN MASON, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2010cv00607
Plaintiff: Harry Thomas
Defendant: City of Albuquerque, P. Bellgart and New Mexico Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Harry Cobb
as 10-5002
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: HARRY THOMAS COBB
LITTLE v. FENTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv02308
Plaintiff: JOYCE A. LITTLE
Defendant: ADRIAN FENTY, VINCENT GRAY, JACK EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1738 State and Territorial Statutes-Full Faith and Credit
Harry Thomas Lusk v. Licoln Electric Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-71294
Plaintiff: Harry Thomas Lusk
Defendant: Licoln Electric Co
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00427
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Aurich v. Thomas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2008cv80108
Plaintiff: Stuart Duane Aurich
Defendant: Harry Thomas and Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Strickland et al v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02190
Plaintiff: Brenda Strickland and Corey Williams
Defendant: Prison Health Services, Inc., Syed Rizvi, Brian Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?