Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Bernard Howard v. Dale Collins, et al
as 24-1079
Plaintiff:
BERNARD HOWARD
Defendant:
REGINALD HARVEL, DALE COLLINS, WILLIAM RICE and others
Monk v. Massey
as 24-40021
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
FNU Massey, Officer at Bowie County Detention Center, FNU Bennett, Lt. Bowie County Dentention Center, FNU Vonn, Lieutenant Bowie County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Risby et al v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Jelia Risby, Patrick Steele, Jaynelle Risby and others
Defendant:
Michael Richardson and ASAP Trans Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Harvell v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10068
Plaintiff:
Debbie Harvell
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harvell v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07525
Plaintiff:
Lori Harvell
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Collins (PS) v. Meir et al
as 1:2023cv01870
Plaintiff:
Dashay Kennyada Collins
Defendant:
Meir, Steffani, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvel v. Walmart Inc.
as 3:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Debra Harvel
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Anderson v. Schildknecht et al
as 3:2023cv02056
Plaintiff:
Jacob Anderson
Defendant:
Josh Schildknecht, Scott Harvel, David Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
