Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Barnett et al v. Adman Electric, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jacob Barnett, Lance Bolton, Benjamin Davis and others
Defendant:
Adman Electric, Inc.
Gaiter v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Felix Xavier Rasul Gaiter
Defendant:
Hayden Marshall and Adam Neely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Church et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
William L.A. Church, Bill Church, Ku Klux Klan and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Directors, Past and Present of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowen v. Sidney Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Bowen
Defendant:
Sidney Police Department, Hayden Bronne, Joseph Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Beglau v. Hayden
as 3:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Joshua G. Beglau
Defendant:
Jeri Hayden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Kilbourne
as 3:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Robert Kidd
Defendant:
Hayden Kilbourne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter v. Hayden et al
as 5:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
D'Andre Thomas Porter
Defendant:
J. Hayden, David D. Clark, Det. Blake Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Hajdin v. OH, et al
as 23-3753
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT HAJDIN, aka James Robert Hayden
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO and MIKE DEWINE
Van Over v. AKHLAGHI et al
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Barry Van Over
Defendant:
MOHAMMAD AKHLAGHI, PAMCHAL SAYYAD, NEXTGEN MMA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
