Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WILLIAMS et al v. BLECKLEY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
PAUL WILLIAMS, HEATHER WILLIAMS and HIDDEN CREEK FARMS & TRANSPORT LLC
Defendant:
BLECKLEY COUNTY GEORGIA, MIKE DAVIS and JAYME KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
E.W. et al v. French et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
E. W., J. W., Joseph Williams and others
Defendant:
Daniel French, Jeanne Collins and Barstow Unified Union School Board of Directors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henry et al v. City of Flint, a municipal corporation et al
as 2:2017cv11061
Plaintiff:
David Isiah Henry and Heather Williams
Defendant:
City of Flint, a municipal corporation, Michael Henige, Sean Coe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PRICE EL v. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2011cv02213
Plaintiff:
LLOYD N. PRICE EL
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY, MAX A. BAKER, JAMES L. JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Stephens et al
as 2:2009cv04390
Plaintiff:
Heather Williams
Defendant:
Jack A Stephens, Deputy Ingargiola, Deputy Bouquet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
