Cases 11 - 20 of 246
Sharif Moore v. Peter Danza
as 23-6680
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARIF HAKIM MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER T. DANZA, D. S. WISE, KIM FOYE and others
Ingram v. Heckman Financial & Insurance Services, Inc.
as 5:2023cv03045
Plaintiff:
Warren Ingram
Defendant:
Heckman Financial & Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15895
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
King v. New York State et al
as 2:2023cv03421
Plaintiff:
Cecil Roy King
Defendant:
New York State, James Francis Mathews, William B. Rebolini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Love v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Felton Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Tracy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felton Love, Jr. v. Rick Hill, et al
as 23-15312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK M. HILL, J. HECKMAN, D. HARRIS and others
Mays v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Johnson, Moreno, Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heckman v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05158
Plaintiff:
Nicole Heckman
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HECKMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24248
Plaintiff:
JAMES HECKMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
