Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Wendell Helfrick v. Russell Rabb, III
as 22-6061
Plaintiff / Appellant: WENDELL C. HELFRICK
Defendant / Appellee: RUSSELL L. RABB, III, Deputy Commonwealth's Attorney of Culpeper County
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03978
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Helfrick v. Rabb We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00689
Petitioner: Wendell C. Helfrick
Respondent: Russell L. Rabb, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HELFRICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02588
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff: RYAN HELFRICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03069
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES, JORDAN BLACKBURN, RICARDO DIXON and others
Defendant: 3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02043
Plaintiff: Matthew Jones, Jordan Blackburn, Ricardo Dixon and others
Defendant: 3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01424
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Marshall v. Hammad et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv03736
Plaintiff: Maeweathers Marshall
Defendant: J. Hammad, P. Kennedy, Helfrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Alameda County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv03310
Plaintiff: Maeweathers Marshall
Defendant: Alameda County, P. Kennedy, Lt. 1669 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Hammad et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv03329
Plaintiff: Maeweathers Marshall
Defendant: J. Hammad, Helfrick, P. Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?