Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cox v. New York State et al
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Henry Cox
Defendant:
New York State and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. DOCCS
as 9:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Henry Cox
Defendant:
DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cox v. Pickett et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Albert Henry Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
J. Pickett, R. Harlan and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99931
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HENRY COX
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTTO v. MCCLEAN et al
as 4:2018cv00311
Defendant:
JOSHUA E DOYLE, FLORIDA BOARD GOVERNORS, VOLKS ANWALT and others
Plaintiff:
LIVIA M SCOTTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv05381
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Cox and Allen Henry Cox
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. American Medical Systems et al
as 1:2012cv00161
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Cox and Allen Henry Cox
Defendant:
American Medical Systems and Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00924
Plaintiff:
Andrea Cox and Henry Cox
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. DePuy, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:12-cv-00924
Plaintiff:
Andrea Cox and Henry Cox
Defendant:
DePuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cox v. People of the State of New York
as 6:2011cv06525
Petitioner:
Henry Cox
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
