Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Eggers et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., incorrectly designated as DOE 1 et al
as 3:2020cv07274
Plaintiff:
Eric Pinkston, Andrew O. Bridgeman, James Messelbeck and others
Defendant:
The Vons Companies, Inc., Grocery Outlet, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation, incorrectly designated as DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. $5,359.00 United States Currency
as 6:2014cv06021
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$5,359.00 United States Currency
Claimant:
Henry Merritt
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Muckle et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv10678
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Muckle
Defendant:
United States of America, George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Holman v. Paulson
as 5:2008cv00616
Plaintiff:
Michael Holman
Defendant:
Henry Merritt Paulson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nick Kolev v. Rabbi Davidi, et al
as 08-56790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICK A. KOLEV, P.E. Ph.D.
Defendant:
RABBI NISSIM DAVIDI, Administrator Rabbinical Council of California (RCC), RABBI MENACHEM GENACK, Rabbinic Administr Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations (OU), THOMAS N. LEDVINA, Associate GC Office of the General Counsel and others
Joseph v. The United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon et al
as 5:2008cv00523
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph
Defendant:
The United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and Agent Secretary of the Treasury Henry Merritt Paulson
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nick A. Kolev v. Nissim Davidi et al
as 2:2008cv05324
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Michael Chertoff, Rabbi Nissim Davidi and others
Plaintiff:
Nick A. Kolev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Paulson
as 1:2007cv00652
Plaintiff:
Glenn Curtis
Defendant:
Henry Merritt Paulson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
