Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Smith v. Billingsley
as 2:2023cv02439
Petitioner:
Bruce Henry Smith
Respondent:
James Billingsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Okhandiar et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Krishna Okhandiar and Remilia Corporation LLC
Defendant:
Henry Smith, Maxwell Roux and John Duff, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Derwin Butler v. Henry Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Derwin Butler, Sr.
Defendant:
Henry Smith, Roy Patterson, Lauana Ronldson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Derwin Batter, Sr. and Derwin Butler, Sr.
Defendant:
Henry Smith, Roy Patterson, Lauana Ronldson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dockery et al
as 2:2020cv02261
Plaintiff:
Marc Henry Smith
Defendant:
M Franco, A. Perez, D Webber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Reoice, et al.
as 1:2019cv01520
Defendant:
Officer Deumas and Sgt. Reoice
Plaintiff:
Henry Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. JUUL Labs Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv07034
Defendant:
JUUL Labs Inc, Altria Group Inc. and Philip Morris USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Henry Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Claude Simpson, et al v. Sandy Alexander, et al
as 19-35230
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXANDERS' TORTFEASOR-CLIENTELE, JOHN ALEXANDER and SANDY ALEXANDER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAUDE D. SIMPSON, JAMES AGGREY-KWEGGYIR ARUNGA and HENRY SMITH
Simpson et al v. Alexander et al
as 6:2019cv00154
Plaintiff:
James Aggrey-Kweggyir Arunga, Henry Smith and Claude D. Simpson
Defendant:
Alexanders' Tortfeasor-Clientele, John Alexander and Sandy Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
