Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Antonio Hudson v. Denise Hood, et al
as 21-2804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DENISE PAGE HOOD, Chief Judge, United States District Court, ARTHUR J TARNOW, Judge, United States District Court, ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Judge, United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and others
United States of America v. $20,000.00 in U.S. Currency
as 1:2021cv01124
Defendant:
$20,000.00 in U.S. Currency
Interested Party:
Thomas Higgins
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Bennett v. Hoss et al
as 2:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Bennett
Defendant:
Graybeal, Higgins, Hoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2021cv00369
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Julius Higgins and Cameron Gernert
Plaintiff:
Adam Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02357
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dale Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Higgins v. Rooney et al
as 4:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Patrick Kessinger, Johnathan Rooney, Patrick Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgins v. Parsons et al
as 3:2021cv00250
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Deputy f/n/u Parsons
Plaintiff:
Charles Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice et al v. Petersen et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
N.N./N.J. and Loring Justice
Defendant:
Petersen and Higgins and Cecilia Petersen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00743
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Higgins v. Gordon Food Service Store LLC
as 1:2020cv01054
Defendant:
Gordon Food Service Store LLC
Plaintiff:
Patrick Higgins, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Patrick Higgins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
