Cases 1 - 10 of 12
American College of Obstetrici v. FDA
as 20-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COUNCIL OF UNIVERSITY CHAIRS OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity of Secretary, United States Department of of Health and Human Services, and his employees, agents and successors in office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
102 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS
Amer College of Obstetricians v. FDA
as 20-1824
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHAN HAHN, M.D., in his official capacity of Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and his employees, agents and successors in office, ALEX AZAR, in his official capacity of Secretary, United States Department of of Health and Human Services, and his employees, agents and successors in office, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF MISSOURI and others
Rebecca Gomperts, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-35655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AIDACCESS, GmbH, a corporation and REBECCA GOMPERTS, Dr.
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS CHRISTL, in his official capacity as the Former Director, Office of Drug Security, Integrity, and Response, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and his employees, agents and successors in office, U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ILISA BERNSTEIN, in her official capacity as the current Acting Director, Office of Drug Security, Integrity, and Response, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and her employees, agents and successors in office and others
Amer College of Obstetricians v. FDA
as 20-1784
Appellant:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF INDIANA and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STEPHAN HAHN, M.D., in his official capacity of Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and his employees, agents and successors in office and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HONOR MACNAUGHTON, M.D., NEW YORK STATE ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, on behalf of its members and members' patients, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE, on behalf of its members and members' patients and others
Waits v. Hyslip et al
as 5:2016cv05365
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Waits
Defendant:
Denny Hyslip, Tim Helder, His Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Stephanie Delzer, et al v. Michael Astrue
as 16-56203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHANIE DELZER, on her own behalf of her minor children C.O.D.1 and C.O.D.2, C. O. D. 1 and C. O. D. 2
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, in his official capacity, and his employees, agents and successors in office
Gretchen Stuart v. Paul Camnitz
as 14-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D., in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., M.D., GREGORY J. BRANNON, M.D., CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD, GREGORY J. BRANNON, MD, CHIMERE COLLINS and others
James Kodak v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-1221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. KODAK
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and his employees, agents and successors in office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
