Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 760
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15697
Petitioner / Appellant: HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Monument Peak Ventures, LLC v. Hitachi Kokusai Electric, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00098
Defendant: Hitachi Kokusai Electric, Inc. and Hitachi Ltd.
Plaintiff: Monument Peak Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Irico Group Corporation, et al
as 19-17428
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS and DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD., THOMSON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, INC., SAMSUNG SDI BRASIL LTDA. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellant: IRICO GROUP CORPORATION and IRICO DISPLAY DEVICES CO., LTD.
Government of Puerto Rico et al v. Panasonic Corporation of North America et al
as 3:2019cv01246
Defendant: Panasonic Corporation of North America, SHENZHEN SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD, LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Government of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 19-16855
Defendant / Appellee: LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified: GORDON B. MORGAN
Christopher Andrews, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-16803
Defendant / Appellee: NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, LG CHEM, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Yet Classified: CHRISTOPHER ANDREWS
In Re: Optical Disk Drive Products Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2010md02143
Plaintiff: Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., Alex Afanasyev and others
Defendant: BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corporation, Hitachi, Ltd. and others
Petitioner: John Doe 1 and Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.
Other: Christopher Andrews, Debbie Bosse, Mr. Stephen Field and others
Not Yet Classified: All Parties, Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc.
Intervenor: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology and U.S. Department of J Antitrust Division
Interested Party: Patrick S. Sweeney, Gregory Starrett and Newegg Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2018cv04879
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv03409
Defendant: Samtel Color, LTD., Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02368
Defendant: Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Edward Breivik, ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and others
Special Master: Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?