Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fox v. Nu Line Transp
as 20-30716
Defendant / Appellant:
Nu Line Transport, L.L.C.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Holly Fox, individually & on behalf of minor children E F & N F and Benjamin Fox, individually & on behalf of minor children E F & N F
Benjamin Fox, et al v. Nu Line Transport, L.L.C.
as 20-90041
Respondent:
Holly Fox, individually & on behalf of minor children E F & N F and Benjamin Fox, individually & on behalf of minor children E F & N F
Petitioner:
Nu Line Transport, L.L.C.
Charest v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2018cv00297
Defendant:
Capt. Willie Knight, State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Charest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charest v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00511
Plaintiff:
Patrick Joseph Charest
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Nu Line Transport L L C et al
as 2:2018cv00502
Defendant:
American Millennium Insurance Co , Nu Line Transport L L C , Simon E Brumfield and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Fox and Holly Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holt v. Givens et al
as 7:2017cv00678
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Holt, Jr
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Scarlotte Robinson, Karen Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Anthony-El v. City of Keller, et al
as 13-10018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS ANTHONY-EL, also known as Amen Ra'el
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF KELLER, JEANIE ROUMELL, HOLLY FOX and others
Anthony-El v. City of Keller et al
as 4:2012cv00689
Plaintiff:
Thomas Anthony-El
Defendant:
City of Keller, Jeanie Roumell, Holly Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anthony-El v. Eustace et al
as 4:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Thomas Anthony-El
Defendant:
Eustace, City of Keller, Jeanie Roumell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
