Cases 11 - 20 of 1,503
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 6:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton #092674 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Dwayne Thomas Horton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. McLarin et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
C McLarin, Webster, Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Dalton Hicks
Respondent:
Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burnett v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Charles Burnett
Respondent:
Jonathan Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Travis Horton
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mays v. Grady County Jail, et al
as 24-6003
Plaintiff:
OTIS MAYS
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY JAIL, GRADY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, FNU CARPENTER and others
Jacobson v. Horton
as 4:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Otto Jacobson
Respondent:
Jonathan W Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobson v. O'BRYANT et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
David Otto Jacobson
Defendant:
WILLIAM O'BRYANT, Deputy Lusk, Deputy Chief Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
