Cases 31 - 40 of 784
Norman v. Horton
as 5:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
John Norman
Defendant:
Joseph Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Milam v. West Tennessee Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
William J. Milam
Defendant:
West Tennessee Healthcare, Inc. doing business as Jackson Madison General Hospital, CITY OF JACKSON, TN, Edward McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Christopher Horton
as 22-5980
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER HORTON
Horton v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Horton
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government and Melinda Jaggers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atkins #742687 v. Gauderer et al
as 1:2022cv00983
Plaintiff:
Allen Atkins #742687
Defendant:
Christian Ernst Gauderer, Heidi E. Washington, David Dawdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Boucher et al
as 2:2022cv12529
Plaintiff:
James Horton
Defendant:
Deputy Ryan Boucher, Deputy J. Aird, Oakland County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Atkins #742687 v. Savoie et al
as 2:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Allen Atkins #742687
Defendant:
Unknown Savoie, Connie Horton, James Corrigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. USA
as 1:2022cv01872
Petitioner:
DeMario J. Horton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Carl Bennett v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL BENNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON ALLEGIANCE HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, staff involved in surgery and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
