Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hose v. Boone County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2023cv04050
Plaintiff:
Mathieu Hose
Defendant:
Boone County Sherriff Departmet, Cody A. Hall and Boone County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hose v. Boone County Sherriff Departmet et al
as 1:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Mathieu Hose
Defendant:
Boone County Sherriff Departmet and Cody A. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Fitzgerald Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00455
Defendant:
Nicholas Ford, Nathaniel R. Hose, Patricia Mysza and others
Plaintiff:
Fabian Santiago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Garris, Jr. v. Lt. Steven Averett
as 14-7507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHANNE GARRIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. STEVEN G. AVERETT, CURTIS JONES, ANN ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
OFC. T. POTEAT and OFC. C. HOLLOWAY
Donte Milburn v. City of York, et al
as 14-1651
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONTE MILBURN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF YORK, MICHAEL S. HOSE, RICHARD PEDDICORD and others
Hicks v. Moore et al
as 1:2013cv02592
Plaintiff:
Darrell Lee Hicks
Defendant:
D. Moore, Hose, E. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Dorning et al
as 5:2013cv01115
Plaintiff:
Zakkawunda Zanumba Moss
Defendant:
Blake Dorning, John K. Williams and John P. Hose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daugherty v. Armstrong et al
as 4:2012cv03133
Defendant:
Armstrong, City of Lincoln, Denzin and others
Plaintiff:
Arrmon H. Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snyder v. State's Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2011cv00994
Plaintiff:
Toby Wayne Snyder
Defendant:
State's Attorney's Office, James Robison, Patricia Moulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. City of Lincoln et al
as 4:2010cv03111
Defendant:
Armstrong, City of Lincoln, Denzin and others
Plaintiff:
Arrmon H. Daugherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
