Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sim v. City of Houston et al
as 4:2026cv01563
Plaintiff:
Eric Sim
Defendant:
CITY OF HOUSTON, KATELYN HOWTON, Kirsten Koryciak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Horton et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11816
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corp Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Horton, John Hoskins, Joel Housworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Stroman, et al. v. Figaroa, et al.
as 1:2025cv00919
Plaintiff:
Pernell Stroman and Chad Goins
Defendant:
Figaroa, Howton, Whitsett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Esurance Insurance Company v. Howton et al
as 1:2025cv00477
Defendant:
Zachary Howton, Zack Howton and Angelo Washington
Plaintiff:
Esurance Insurance Company
Pretrial Service:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Howton v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2025cv00108
Petitioner:
Jack Eugene Howton
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mark Chapman, et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 24-1554
Plaintiff:
CLAY KINCHELOE, TERRI EGLEBERRY, Successor of the Deceased, WILLIAM MCDUFFIE and others
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Howton v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01122
Plaintiff:
Jennifer J Howton
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
In re: General Motors, LLC
as 23-106
Petitioner:
In re: GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
Respondent:
MARK D. CHAPMAN, WILLIAM MCDUFFIE, CLAY KINCHELOE and others
USA v. Jack Howton
as 23-5028
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JACK E. HOWTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
