Cases 41 - 50 of 835
Humphries v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Tivon Humphries
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HUMPHRIES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12465
Plaintiff:
MARK ERIC HUMPHRIES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Felton Ladell Humphries, Jr. v. Dan Samuels
as 2:2023cv04179
Petitioner:
Felton Ladell Humphries, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KINARD v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09991
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KINARD, LAYWOOD MOLETTE, JONATHAN OVERFELT and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. David Humphries, Jr.
as 23-3411
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID HUMPHRIES, JR.
Kinard et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01215
Plaintiff:
Brian Kinard, Laywood Molette, Jonathan Overfelt and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Humphries v. Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc
as 6:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Hedrick Humphries
Defendant:
Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
McNair v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
My-Son McNair
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Brian Williams, Robert Hartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USSEC v. Matthew Beasley, et al
as 23-15512
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, BEASLEY LAW GROUP PC, JEFFREY J. JUDD and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
OMID SHAHABE and KRISTIE YOUNG, Proposed Intervenors
Receiver:
GEOFF WINKLER
Arnette v. Tire One, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01456
Plaintiff:
Clayton L.J.W. Arnette and Clayton Arnette
Defendant:
Tire One, LLC and Jamie Burns Humphries
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
