Cases 61 - 70 of 214
McEwen v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01167
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey McEwen
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01180
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bess v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01176
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Bess
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01151
Plaintiff:
Leon George Williams
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Maurice Williamson
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Husky Marketing and Supply Company v. FERC, et al
as 22-1249
Petitioner:
Husky Marketing and Supply Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
(PC) Esparza v. Husky et al
as 2:2022cv00822
Plaintiff:
Daniel Esparza
Defendant:
Husky and Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jess Brasuell, III v. San Luis Obispo County Jail, et al
as 22-55316
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESS D. BRASUELL III
Defendant / Appellee:
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY JAIL, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, Custody Division Deputies and Staff, official capacity and others
Smith et al v. Husky Construction, Inc.
as 0:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Joel Smith, John Nesse, Daniel Shoemaker and others
Defendant:
Husky Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
